Watching a video of Franck Abed rightly criticizing the FN defending tooth and nail but the royalist, I am legitimately raised the question about the real benefits that would cause the return of the king.
Premiere question: Now that would be King of France?
2 people can claim the throne. First Louis de Bourbon, Duke of Anjou, English (sic) living in Caracas (which does not displease me, but that may seem suspicious ...), married to María Margarita Vargas Santaella, daughter a banker Venezuelan descendant of a English conquistador. He could become Louis XX exercises "noble" profession ... banker. Their 3 children were born in United States. Then
Henri d'Orleans, Count of Paris and Duke of France, born in Belgium (sic), married twice (re-sic is not very Catholic all that!). His first wife was the German Marie-Thérèse of Württemberg. The second, y Micaela Cousiño Quiñones de León is the daughter of Luis Maximiliano Cousiño, heir to one of the most powerful families pioneers and founders of Chile.
Second question: While the kingdom has long been effective, would it work today?
When you notice the globalists acquaintances of our "Future Kings" may really doubt the effectiveness of their action. They are even more detached from the lives of French politicians and attend our mostly foreigners in the same class.
In addition, there are still countries "governed" by the Kings. For example, Spain and Thailand, is that the Kings have represented a barrier to destructive liberalism oppressing their people?
If at the time, interest corresponded to the interests of the nobles of France, it's not really the case today ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment