SNCF announced both an increase in its rates ( here) and a decrease in the number of Jews.
Proof in video.
Still, an apology from the station are not sufficient. Avi Bitton, a lawyer of 600 former users of the transportation company SNCF said that "trying to pay a lesser cost to memory a few words of apology cost him nothing when he is asked to compensate victims that have ever been. "
To which an anonymous officer retorted: "They received a complimentary way, they want anything more? "
This site Masonic Response secular (1) which has" revealed "information that greatly disturbs Bouteldja Houria, Indigenous spokesperson of the Republic.
The author of the famous "under-dog" in French Taddéi to describe "white" is an employee of the Institute of the Arab world, as shown on the next page cache (since his name was removed):
Obviously, investigations of Lay Response, true body of B'nai B'rith (2), stop here.
The president of the Institute of the Arab world is none other than Dominique Baudis, a member of the honorary committee of the France-Israel! (3)
Association headed by Gilles-William Goldnadel has "tried tirelessly in all national and international awareness of the inalienable rights of the Jewish nation on its National Home."
Now we better understand the provocative "anti-white" Bouteldja which fits into the logic of the clash of civilizations in the amount French immigrant against the African "souchiens.
Many leftists have Sarkozy as an authoritarian president. If the leftist bullshit deserves an article itself, see a book, it is important to remember that Sarkozy is anything but an authoritarian president.
Sarkozy is a liberal-safe. He has no power because he is an agent of globalism, liberalism, financial lobbies. So to pretend to some semblance of authority, he put more cops on the street to piss in the end the French worker!
Authority in politics is show that we really can. For example, it is forcibly nationalize, expropriate a company that outsources its production abroad while it is already making large profits in France. What Sarkozy can do this since the disappearance of borders that has helped to destroy him keep.
As such, Hugo Chavez is a true example of authoritarian president.
Premiere question: Now that would be King of France?
2 people can claim the throne. First Louis de Bourbon, Duke of Anjou, English (sic) living in Caracas (which does not displease me, but that may seem suspicious ...), married to María Margarita Vargas Santaella, daughter a banker Venezuelan descendant of a English conquistador. He could become Louis XX exercises "noble" profession ... banker. Their 3 children were born in United States. Then
Henri d'Orleans, Count of Paris and Duke of France, born in Belgium (sic), married twice (re-sic is not very Catholic all that!). His first wife was the German Marie-Thérèse of Württemberg. The second, y Micaela Cousiño Quiñones de León is the daughter of Luis Maximiliano Cousiño, heir to one of the most powerful families pioneers and founders of Chile.
Second question: While the kingdom has long been effective, would it work today?
When you notice the globalists acquaintances of our "Future Kings" may really doubt the effectiveness of their action. They are even more detached from the lives of French politicians and attend our mostly foreigners in the same class.
In addition, there are still countries "governed" by the Kings. For example, Spain and Thailand, is that the Kings have represented a barrier to destructive liberalism oppressing their people?
If at the time, interest corresponded to the interests of the nobles of France, it's not really the case today ...
The wikipedia page on Israel that you'll never see:
Israel is a country of poor Jews came mainly from Europe and Maghreb who believed in the Zionist project and let themselves be fooled by promoting "Apartment + free financing of his holiness Bishop Rothschild."
In reality, nobody asks the question: Why the greatest artisans, activists and financiers of Zionism do not live in Israel?
The vile beast is back. Marine Le Pen revives the family tradition. The Elysee ordered (1), the media every effort, the buzz is on!
Deciphering the case in three points:
1 - On the merits, Marine Le Pen is right
For some Sept. 11, everything is good to demonize Islam. By praying in the street, Muslims believe they advance their cause?
While they are desperately short of places of worship, do they put themselves in place of the average French, already harassed daily by television propagandists, who finds himself trapped in his own street after an exhausting day of work? It
give the stick to be beaten and Marine Le Pen, political strategist, has no hesitation step into the breach.
2 - Misuse of debate
This case is not trivial. Coincidentally, it comes as Marine Le Pen announced his willingness, if it comes to power, leaving the European Union and points to the Law 73 (Rothschild said law which obliges France to borrow from private banks ). Two proposals primordial no politician official so far has dared to mention in the mainstream media.
All this noise around the word "occupation" (2) smothers what really needs to be highlighted and to debate.
3 - Double demonization
The media-lies play their part perfectly: So, Marine Le Pen is no longer the candidate who wants to free France from the EU and the bank, but the candidate anti-Muslim. Somewhere, it will teach him to defend secularism and ambient forget to denounce the influence of the CRIF.
As for Muslims precisely, the stupidity of some made them out once more for disrespectful invaders anxious to Islamicize France!
After all, the clash of civilizations dear to the Zionists will grace the useful idiots on both sides!
Notes:
(1) Jean-François Kahn speaks at the Elysee instructions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDW9p02vO5Y&feature=player_embedded
(2) Until proven otherwise, the word occupation is not only valid to discuss the Second World War.